In this article, I focus on music in digital formats. Moreover, because I am a Linux kind-of-guy, I'm going to take a Linux kind-of-perspective on this topic. Most people have heard of the MP3 format. It's an example of two things: First, it is not an open format, as a number of organizations claim patents on it. And second, it is a 'lossy' format. Lossy formats compress the original signal by throwing out some of the signal components. The original rationale for this compression was to make music files smaller and more easily distributed. In contrast, there are also 'lossless' formats, which can be compressed (without throwing away the original signal) or not. Digital music presented on the Compact Disc (CD) is an example of a lossless format (assuming it's an audio CD, not a data CD with MP3s saved on it). Naruto shippuden 163 sub. Naruto Shippuuden Episode 162 Subtitle Indonesia rilis cepat di neatfreakscleaningsolutions.com, rekomendasikan teman-temanmu untuk menonton Naruto Shippuuden Episode 162 di sini. Tags: Naruto Shippuuden Episode 162 Subtitle Indonesia, Nonton Naruto Shippuuden Episode 162, Streaming Naruto Shippuuden Episode 162, Naruto Shippuuden Episode 162 Online, Download Naruto Shippuuden Episode 162 Sub Indo, Naruto Shippuuden Episode 162 HD, Naruto Shippuuden Episode 162 Gratis, Unduh Naruto Shippuuden Episode 162, Naruto Shippuuden Episode 162 Terbaru. ![]() I've tried using MediaMonkey to rip to FLAC but despite endless amounts of. A collegue of mine can hear the difference between an original. Correctly, you could convert any of the lossless formats back to WAV. It is also worth mentioning that there are two main ways to encode digital music: pulse code modulation (PCM) and delta-sigma modulation (DSM). Until recently, most digital music has been encoded using PCM; but Sony and Philips established a DSM-based standard called DSD and implemented it on Super Audio CD (SACD) disks. A small but growing amount of music is available for download in this standard. We'll leave it to to explain the difference in more detail. Those of us who are concerned about software freedom should prefer completely free formats like (lossy) and (lossless, compressed). We should particularly avoid file formats that include options for digital rights management (DRM). In theory, one might think that DRM is just a mechanism to prevent the unauthorized use (theft?) of someone's intellectual property. However, certain vendors use DRM to force their customers to use their software, and sometimes hardware. Once again, has a nice detailed article about this whole format business. But deciding on a format is not—or at least should not—be a primary concern. Rather, each of us has a different set of objectives with respect to the use of music. I'm going to explain my objectives, and then further explain how those objectives influence my decision on file formats. First, and for emphasis, I am a big supporter of software freedom. This means I prefer the Ogg or FLAC formats for digital music. Any format with limited access due to a patent or trade secret is of little or no interest to me. Scan usb for malware mac. Second, my music collection stretches back to the 1960s. I still have most of the LPs I bought years ago (sometimes to my embarrassment), and one of the things that gives me great pleasure is how good some of those old LPs still sound on modern analog playback equipment. I like to think that good-sounding LPs, like Dave Brubeck's, originally recorded in 1959, still sounds incredibly fresh and clear in part because the people who recorded it did an excellent and careful job with their equipment. And so when I buy music now, whether on LP or as a music download, I try to get the very best quality of recording I can. Therefore, I buy digital lossless in strong preference to lossy. In fact, if something is only available in a lossy format, I usually don't bother buying it. And not only do I buy lossless, but I buy it at a higher resolution than 'CD standard' when available. And for sure my preferred lossless format is FLAC! Let's talk about resolution for a minute. Music on a CD is presented at a sampling rate of 44.1kHz and with a word length of 16 bits. In theory this means the loudest sound recorded on a CD is 2 16, or 65,536, times as loud as the softest sound. This means that if you have a recording that shows this full dynamic range and turn up your volume to the point where you can just hear the quietest parts, then the loudest parts will be so loud as to cross the auditory pain threshold. Moreover, the tells us that the 44.1kHz sampling rate is more than ample to preserve sound frequencies up to 20kHz (the 'kHz' is an abbreviation for 'kiloHertz', or cycles per second), which is said to be the upper limit of audibility for humans with excellent hearing. So why do I think I need higher resolution than the CD standard? A recording presented at a sampling rate of 96kHz and with a word length of 24 bits provides a great deal more 'room' to fit in the original analog signal—not just the loudest sound and the softest sound—than does the 44.1/16 version. This means a recording need not be at a level so close to the maximum that it occasionally exceeds it. (A signal that exceeds the maximum is said to be 'clipped,' and clipping introduces all sorts of nasty sounds not present in the original recording.) Moreover, quiet sounds in the music have more bits to represent them. For example, Marconi Union's is regularly 25dB below maximum. A dB, or decibel, is a ratio between the actual level (-25dB in this case) and a reference level, 0dB. A signal that is -25dB below reference has the four most significant bits set to zero.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |